Understanding objective idealism:(Part 10) Final thoughts, summary and conclusion 

Since we have refuted the common objections to objective idealism I want to close this series by basically summarizing the whole thing. In (Part 1) we examined philosophy of mind and the problems for positions that compete with idealism. In (Part 2) we discussed quantum mechanics and certain experiments that support idealism. In (Part 3) we showed how the universe is a simulation and the evidence that supports it. In (Part 4) we discussed integrated information theory and quantum cognition and how our thoughts are modeled quantum mechanically. In (Part 5) and (Part 6) we discussed Neoplatonism and the difference between inner space and outer space. In (Part 7) we talked about the mind of God and presented the infinite simulation argument. In (Part 8) we discussed the difference between existence and non-existence in objective idealism and finally in (Part 9) we refuted common objections to idealism.

This series was one of my long ones and I hope all my readers enjoyed reading its content. I will do future series in this blog and blog post about different things but this series was meant for a layman audience to understand objective idealism and some of the evidence that supports it. But for now we can confidently say that all of reality is inside Gods day dream as we are figments of Gods imagination. So that will conclude this series and I hope to more in the future I will leave you a quote from Werner Heisenberg

“I think that modern physics has definitely decided in favor of Plato. In fact the smallest units of matter are not physical objects in the ordinary sense, they are forms, ideas which can be expressed unambiguously only in mathematical language” -Werner Heisenberg theoretical physicist.

Leave a comment